<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publisher as brand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/</link>
	<description>Writing and publishing in the digital near-future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:13:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Hi Pauline, thanks for commenting! Those are all well-known and respected imprints or publishing companies but, with perhaps the exception of Mills &amp; Boon, I&#039;m not sure a significant number of readers would buy their books &lt;em&gt;because&lt;/em&gt; of the imprint, as opposed to being interested in a particular author, title or genre.

Mills &amp; Boon is a great example of strong publisher brand though, because I believe its brand exceeds the individual sales power of any one author. Of the thousands of authors published under the Mills &amp; Boon imprint, only a relative handful have broken out to establish their own author brand. Readers seek out Mills &amp; Book titles because they want a particular kind of reading experience and they trust M&amp;B to deliver it. That&#039;s an incredibly powerful market position for any publisher to occupy.

Penguin is also interesting, though, because I think it developed the same kind of publisher brand power in the early days of Allen Lane&#039;s &quot;Penguins&quot;. Penguin paperbacks were a simple, limited concept in the early days - quality, affordable, accessible literature in paperback. Perhaps the simple brand message was part of its overwhelming success. Over the decades, Penguin has grown and so has its reputation but it no longer has the same sense of focused brand identity for general consumers. I doubt people walk into a bookstore thinking &quot;I want to buy a Penguin today&quot;. 

Best wishes,
Kate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pauline, thanks for commenting! Those are all well-known and respected imprints or publishing companies but, with perhaps the exception of Mills &amp; Boon, I&#8217;m not sure a significant number of readers would buy their books <em>because</em> of the imprint, as opposed to being interested in a particular author, title or genre.</p>
<p>Mills &amp; Boon is a great example of strong publisher brand though, because I believe its brand exceeds the individual sales power of any one author. Of the thousands of authors published under the Mills &amp; Boon imprint, only a relative handful have broken out to establish their own author brand. Readers seek out Mills &amp; Book titles because they want a particular kind of reading experience and they trust M&amp;B to deliver it. That&#8217;s an incredibly powerful market position for any publisher to occupy.</p>
<p>Penguin is also interesting, though, because I think it developed the same kind of publisher brand power in the early days of Allen Lane&#8217;s &#8220;Penguins&#8221;. Penguin paperbacks were a simple, limited concept in the early days &#8211; quality, affordable, accessible literature in paperback. Perhaps the simple brand message was part of its overwhelming success. Over the decades, Penguin has grown and so has its reputation but it no longer has the same sense of focused brand identity for general consumers. I doubt people walk into a bookstore thinking &#8220;I want to buy a Penguin today&#8221;. </p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Kate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauline</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Faber &amp; Faber, Penguin, Mills &amp; Boon, Ladybird Books, Dorling Kindersley, Usborne, Granta.... There&#039;s actually a long list of clear publishing brands (some with their own merchandising, see Penguin). Publisher as brand works when you know what you will get with the brand. I don&#039;t think multinational corporation publishers will be able to swing that, except by way of their known imprints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faber &amp; Faber, Penguin, Mills &amp; Boon, Ladybird Books, Dorling Kindersley, Usborne, Granta&#8230;. There&#8217;s actually a long list of clear publishing brands (some with their own merchandising, see Penguin). Publisher as brand works when you know what you will get with the brand. I don&#8217;t think multinational corporation publishers will be able to swing that, except by way of their known imprints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://rachelkovacs.wordpress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>http://rachelkovacs.wordpress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for the article. It was very helpful. I have been looking for an article like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for the article. It was very helpful. I have been looking for an article like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Kate, for raising this oh-so-timely question. From my own experience in publishing over 20 some years, I&#039;d say definitely a small publisher can be a brand that readers will look for. A classic example from Britain in the 1970s and 80s was Virago Press, one of the very first feminist publishing companies. With such a limited selection of women&#039;s literature and feminist titles from other publishers at the time, readers had to ask booksellers, &quot;Where&#039;s your Virago section?&quot;

More recently I&#039;m sensing that the more entrepeneurial self-published authors are creating publishing brands under which they offer products by others that are likely to appeal to their own loyal readers. I use the word &quot;products&quot; advisedly, because we&#039;re at the point where the book is only one manifestation of many possible forms that intellectual property can take. For those of us who cut our publishing teeth in the book world, that&#039;s a hard nut to swallow and digest. As we speak, publishing is being redefined. Tech savvy and an understanding that customers are looking for good content in a flexible medley of formats  are the hallmarks of these new publishers and they&#039;re creating their own brands as they go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Kate, for raising this oh-so-timely question. From my own experience in publishing over 20 some years, I&#8217;d say definitely a small publisher can be a brand that readers will look for. A classic example from Britain in the 1970s and 80s was Virago Press, one of the very first feminist publishing companies. With such a limited selection of women&#8217;s literature and feminist titles from other publishers at the time, readers had to ask booksellers, &#8220;Where&#8217;s your Virago section?&#8221;</p>
<p>More recently I&#8217;m sensing that the more entrepeneurial self-published authors are creating publishing brands under which they offer products by others that are likely to appeal to their own loyal readers. I use the word &#8220;products&#8221; advisedly, because we&#8217;re at the point where the book is only one manifestation of many possible forms that intellectual property can take. For those of us who cut our publishing teeth in the book world, that&#8217;s a hard nut to swallow and digest. As we speak, publishing is being redefined. Tech savvy and an understanding that customers are looking for good content in a flexible medley of formats  are the hallmarks of these new publishers and they&#8217;re creating their own brands as they go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on Best of TOC eBook from O&#8217;Reilly &#171; Kindle 2, Kindle Books Reader 2.0 - Amazon Kindle 2 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Best of TOC eBook from O&#8217;Reilly &#171; Kindle 2, Kindle Books Reader 2.0 - Amazon Kindle 2 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] Publisher as Brand - This is another exceptional article. Publishers need to understand that seeing Publishers as people makes everyone much likelier to try to understand their perspective, and not view them as monsters standing in the face of progress. Not to mention that Brand is going to become super important as the Publishing industry evolves with technological advances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Publisher as Brand &#8211; This is another exceptional article. Publishers need to understand that seeing Publishers as people makes everyone much likelier to try to understand their perspective, and not view them as monsters standing in the face of progress. Not to mention that Brand is going to become super important as the Publishing industry evolves with technological advances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post-Media Branding &#171; V-TYPE MEDiA blog</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Post-Media Branding &#171; V-TYPE MEDiA blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-126</guid>
		<description>[...] Going through my Google Alerts today, I stumbled upon a quote/ argument that I found intriguing from the Electric Alphabet blog:  … is the author the only brand? Isn’t it possible, however unlikely, that some publishers could create an identity so strong and a community so vibrant that audiences seek out their books because they trust and like the people producing them? Electric Alphabet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Going through my Google Alerts today, I stumbled upon a quote/ argument that I found intriguing from the Electric Alphabet blog:  … is the author the only brand? Isn’t it possible, however unlikely, that some publishers could create an identity so strong and a community so vibrant that audiences seek out their books because they trust and like the people producing them? Electric Alphabet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaina</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Hi Kate,

I stumbled across this post through a link from O&#039;Reilly TOC (http://toc.oreilly.com/2008/10/do-publisher-brands-still-have.html) and your question was just what I was looking for. I&#039;ve been thinking about publishers creating a brand and whether it was worthwhile, and I think I might have finally found the way to phrase the question for my Publishing MA dissertation.

Thanks for thinking out loud here and giving me some clarity! -Elaina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kate,</p>
<p>I stumbled across this post through a link from O&#8217;Reilly TOC (<a href="http://toc.oreilly.com/2008/10/do-publisher-brands-still-have.html" rel="nofollow">http://toc.oreilly.com/2008/10/do-publisher-brands-still-have.html</a>) and your question was just what I was looking for. I&#8217;ve been thinking about publishers creating a brand and whether it was worthwhile, and I think I might have finally found the way to phrase the question for my Publishing MA dissertation.</p>
<p>Thanks for thinking out loud here and giving me some clarity! -Elaina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publisher as Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Publisher as Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] Kate Eltham ruminates on publishers, brands, the author, and the web. Does a publisher&#8217;s brand have any relevance for readers? Should a publisher invest heavily in a significant web presence, or leave that to the writers? Kate goes back and forth on the question, bouncing around ideas about the new experimental imprint at HarperCollins, HarperStudio, and their blog the26thstory. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kate Eltham ruminates on publishers, brands, the author, and the web. Does a publisher&#8217;s brand have any relevance for readers? Should a publisher invest heavily in a significant web presence, or leave that to the writers? Kate goes back and forth on the question, bouncing around ideas about the new experimental imprint at HarperCollins, HarperStudio, and their blog the26thstory. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Casual Optimist - Monday Miscellany, Oct 6, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>The Casual Optimist - Monday Miscellany, Oct 6, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-124</guid>
		<description>[...] Publisher as Brand? Kate Eltham of Electric Alphabet discusses HarperStudio and wonders whether publishers should spend time  and resources on their own brand identities. (via Tools of Change for Publishing) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Publisher as Brand? Kate Eltham of Electric Alphabet discusses HarperStudio and wonders whether publishers should spend time  and resources on their own brand identities. (via Tools of Change for Publishing) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.electricalphabet.net/2008/10/04/publisher-as-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalphabet.wordpress.com/?p=263#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I think both publishers and authors need to bring some branding to the table. Publishers can definitely win points with readers and authors by sharing some of what goes on behind the scenes. What editors are working with what authors and what&#039;s that like? What designers are working on which titles, and what are they excited about for the next season? The house that signs and nurtures an author is lending its brand to that author and vice versa, and that part of the process shouldn&#039;t be lost on the reading public. With indies it is a little more obvious, but even with the big guys, there are real people making these books come to life.

On the other hand, most authors definitely have more to say to their fans than can or should fit within a publisher&#039;s branding scope. I like to see publishers&#039; sites include a portal/hub where authors&#039; blogs can be listed and featured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think both publishers and authors need to bring some branding to the table. Publishers can definitely win points with readers and authors by sharing some of what goes on behind the scenes. What editors are working with what authors and what&#8217;s that like? What designers are working on which titles, and what are they excited about for the next season? The house that signs and nurtures an author is lending its brand to that author and vice versa, and that part of the process shouldn&#8217;t be lost on the reading public. With indies it is a little more obvious, but even with the big guys, there are real people making these books come to life.</p>
<p>On the other hand, most authors definitely have more to say to their fans than can or should fit within a publisher&#8217;s branding scope. I like to see publishers&#8217; sites include a portal/hub where authors&#8217; blogs can be listed and featured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
